Suffering as resistance against subliminal enhancement
‘Suffering’ designates an original,
subliminal self-experience of the soul which may surface in limit experiences
of conscious awareness. Consciously suffering pain, loss or loneliness actualises primordial suffering which confronts the soul with an original void ‘with
which’ it as it were skirmishes (as though this void were an object – which it
is not). This primordial suffering aggravates ‘superficial’ sorrow (sit
venia verbo) by doubling it with radical despair.
Clearly, this insight is
not new; it has been indirectly brought to light by psychoanalysis and existentialist
philosophy. My claim, however, partly goes beyond psychoanalytical or existentialist
concerns.
Suffering, I argue, testifies to unconscious resistance against
subliminal enhancement (which is my definition of 'death'). I agree with Freud, Sartre or Heidegger when they highlight
the despair which exacerbates suffering. But at least Freud and Heidegger cannot
do justice to suffering as inverted ecstasy. This entails that they remain
blind to human resistance against subliminal enhancement.
Freud, who acknowledges the unconscious and even
subliminal enhancement (albeit only during lifetime), believes that the latter
is inexorably limited by (what he terms) the ‘reality principle’; this entails
that, in his view, subliminal enhancement will always be finite and restricted
to the boundaries of conscious social life.
[1] On human authenticity, Sartre
writes, “Ainsi retrouvons-nous mais dans l’humilité de la finitude, l’extase de
la Création divine.” J.-P. Sartre (1983). Cahiers pour une morale.
Paris: Gallimard, p. 513. And “le monde qui m’apparaît est source de joie en ce
que je me découvre comme absolu en le découvrant comme absolu”, ib., p.
512 ; or “La perception est surgissement de l’Etre, explosion fixe et
vertigineuse de l’Etre dans le "il ya", est c’est là
originellement pour le Pour-soi la jouissance.” Ib., p. 510.
Reacties
Een reactie posten